Essay PreviewMore ↓
Peter Brimelow is a senior editor for Forbes magazine. The essay was written taken from Forbes magazine (July 4, 1994).
Peter Brimelow’s “Thank You for Smoking” is a misleading argument which has very little precise evidence and illustrates a weak argument. The essay is about how smoking in some small ways, can be good for you. (Brimelow). In his claim it sounds like he isn’t sure of it himself because he used “might be” and “some” which are not strong argumentative words. When stating a major claim it has to be strong and get the message clear. It is supported by logic and reason, not by emotional rhetoric. (Clark 5).
Brimelow’s rebuttal talks about the Surgeon General and how he has determined smoking is not at all dangerous to your health. A rebuttal points out instances in which the claim or warrant might not be true or ways the audience might object to what the author is arguing. He goes on to say that 400,000 deaths are related to smoking each year. His rebuttal to this is comparing smoking with driving. He goes on to say that driving causes 40,000 deaths in one year. These two numbers comparing the number of deaths caused my smoking and car accidents are not even close to comparison. Another car can collide with them or bad roads can cause accidents, while smoking is totally preventable and can be controlled by the person.
Value is what the author believes strongly in and in this essay freedom is Brimelow’s value stated. I think it was clever using freedom to compare because it appeals to people and it gets their attention and keeps it. He says driving cars is dangerous and people have the freedom to drive cars then they should have the freedom to smoke where they want. Is it the smoker’s right to come into a room full of non-smokers and light up a cigarette? Should all the non-smokers have to bear the smoke or have to leave because they have a right to smoke anywhere they want. Smokers have the right to smoke but only where smoking is permitted. If they want to harm themselves let them do it alone and not harm people who want to breathe clean air.
How to Cite this Page
"A Critique of Thank You for Smoking. . .?." 123HelpMe.com. 17 Jan 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Critique of “Thank You for Smoking…?” “Thank You for Smoking…?” is an article written by Peter Brimelow about the benefits of smoking. Brimelow provides some very clear points which are well addressed. Even though I do not agree with the subject that “smoking, in a way, is good for you,” (141) I think Peter Brimelow did a thorough job of making his opinions credible to the reader. Major Claim and Grounds This essay is a good example of a deductive essay because it moves from generalizations to specific instances (McFadden, 2003).... [tags: Critiques]
1035 words (3 pages)
- A Critique of “Thank You for Smoking. . .?" Peter Brimelow is a senior editor for Forbes magazine. The essay was written taken from Forbes magazine (July 4, 1994). Peter Brimelow’s “Thank You for Smoking” is a misleading argument which has very little precise evidence and illustrates a weak argument. The essay is about how smoking in some small ways, can be good for you. (Brimelow). In his claim it sounds like he isn’t sure of it himself because he used “might be” and “some” which are not strong argumentative words.... [tags: Expository]
876 words (2.5 pages)
- A Critique of “Thank You for Smoking…?” Intro: The essay “Thank You for Smoking,” written by Peter Brimelow, is far from an influential essay on why people should smoke. Through this essay, Brimelow makes an effort to convince the audience smoking is actually beneficial to your health. I find it hard for people to write about what they think are the benefits of smoking when there are so many obvious reasons why you should not smoke. The main audience being targeted in this article is those who already smoke and those who are thinking about smoking.... [tags: Critical Essays]
833 words (2.4 pages)
- A Critique of “Thank You for Smoking…?” Peter Brimelow’s “Thank You for Smoking…?” had me interested from the title alone. This essay lists a few of the benefits that can occur from smoking. Bimelow is aware of the many dangers of smoking as he acknowledges “the Environmental Protection Agency has claimed that ‘second hand smoke’ is a significant risk for nonsmokers and the Food & Drug Administration is making noises about regulating nicotine as a drug” (The Genre of Argument 141).... [tags: Critical Essays]
800 words (2.3 pages)
- Peter Brimelow's “Thank You for Smoking…?” Peter Brimelow’s “Thank You for Smoking…?” is a well-written argument with a lot of evidence to support his claim. Other than the last two paragraphs, Brimelow provides rational support for the positive side of smoking. His article discusses the benefits that smoking can have to peoples’ health. Such evidence as that of D.M Warbutton, a British researcher who said that smoking stimulates alertness, dexterity, and cognitive capacity (141). Citing a number of scientific journals, Brimlow has also found that smoking can reduce the risk of developing such diseases as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, Endometrial cancer, Prostate cancer, Osteoarthr... [tags: Brimelow Thank You Smoking Essays]
956 words (2.7 pages)
- Deconstruction of Thank You, Ma’am There are a million acts of kindness each day. Some young man gives a stranger a compliment, or a teacher brightens a students morning. But, in the world we live in today, these acts are rare to come by. In this short story Thank You, Ma’am, the boy, out of mysterious luck, gets taken in by the woman whom he was trying to steal a purse from. Her actions, following the incident towards the boy, may have seemed very kind and understanding, but the boy needs a more solid way of punishment.... [tags: Thank You, Ma’am]
710 words (2 pages)
- Rebuttal of Peter Brimelow’s, “Thank You for Smoking…?” Have you ever been in a room full of people who are smoking. Have you ever questioned why they would put their health as well as yours in jeopardy by smoking. Did you ever think smoking could be good for you. Peter Brimelow says just that in his article “Thank You for Smoking…?” In Brimlow’s article, he explains all the health benefits smoking can provide you. Such evidence as that of D.M Warbutton, a British researcher who said that smoking stimulates alertness, dexterity, and cognitive capacity(141).... [tags: Rebuttal Smoking Smoker Essays]
1051 words (3 pages)
- Analysis of Peter Brimelow's Thank You for Smoking Growing up with a best friend who has been smoking since middle school, I have seen many of the negative effects it has on a person. Football was a passion and way of life for Andy; however, smoking caused him to struggle with breathing while running up and down the field. He would cut down on his daily amount of cigarettes before and during the season, but cutting down was little help for him. Not only was his breathing affected by smoking, but he also had yellow teeth, smoker’s cough, and would get “the shakes” when in need of a smoke.... [tags: Smoking Analysis Brimelow Essays Papers]
1244 words (3.6 pages)
- Thank You for Smoking “Take another drag. That’s good for you.” One might not hear that everyday, but Peter Brimelow’s “Thank You for Smoking…?” is a very well written deductive argument that may have you believing that statement by the time you’re done reading his article. Brimelow’s argument is clearly inductive because he presents his samples right away which lead to generalizations that are drawn from those examples (McFadden). Brimelow comes right out early in the argument and informs the reader smoking can be beneficial to one’s health (141).... [tags: Peter Brimelow Tobacco Health Essays]
1113 words (3.2 pages)
- “Thank You for Smoking…?” Peter Brimelow brings to light an interesting idea in his essay “Thank You for Smoking…?” Brimelow’s purpose of his essay is to defend smoking. He provides the audience with information that is worthy of their consideration and valid enough to make them think twice about how they stand on the issue of smoking. Unfortunately, some flaws in Brimelow’s technique distract the audience from his message that smoking is not as unhealthy as it appears. A few mistakes transform his work from a well-written argumentative essay to an unsuccessful attempt to spread his beliefs.... [tags: Peter Brimelow Tobacco Essays]
1040 words (3 pages)
Backing provides support for the author’s warrant. The backing should be from a reliable source and backed by credible authorities. (Clark 5). His backing is from a British researcher D.M. Warburton who showed that cigarettes do stimulate alertness, dexterity, and cognitive capacity. Brimelow also points out in his backing that smoking helps to keep a person awake while driving long distances or flying. Smoking can stimulate the central nervous system but it’s not wise to start smoking just to increase alertness. Smoking carries too many negatives for one small positive.
He then switches the subject to say “smoking seems also to offer subtler health rewards to balance against its undisputed risks.” (Thank You). He uses the word undisputed risks meaning that theses risks are certain and cannot be forgotten or ignored. This value is not a strong one because of the wordings of seems and disputed. He sounds like he is not sure of the health rewards he claim can benefit from smoking.
The backing for the second value goes into diseases that can be supposedly cut if someone smoked. Smoking can cut Parkinson’s disease by half the rate as a non-smoker. Alzheimer’s disease can also be cut by 50% if a person smoked. In reality doctors do not know what causes Alzheimer’s. Endometrial cancer can also be cut as much as 50% with smokers than non-smokers. Prostate cancer with smokers is cut in half compared to non-smokers. He adds this needs corroboration though. Osteoarthritis is five times as less likely to develop with smokers. Colon cancer and ulcerative colitis is 30% to 50% less with smokers than with people who do not smoke. (Brimelow). All this sounds good and even beneficial, but all of these numbers are at 50% which is half the population. Brimelow is taking advantage of numbers that are statistics. All of these diseases have another thing in common; doctors are not sure what exactly causes them.[Add a document citation here, including the page number if there is one.] Three-fourths of these statistics are also based on surveys, which are not always accurate. All of this backing is not logical or by any means true. He is using diseases not fully understood to his advantage giving smoking a better image.
Brimelows’s minor claim is the human system can clear the effects of three to five cigarettes a day. He says that there is no current support for his claim and is merely based on assumptions by him. “It appears the human system can clear the effects of three to five of the much stronger pre- 1960 cigarettes, if dispersed across a day, with very little risk.” (Brimelow). This is not widely supported and is not a logical statement. This argument is based upon untrue facts
Brimelow, Peter. “Thank You for Smoking. . .?” The Genre of Argument. Ed. Irene L. Clark. Boston: Thomson- Heinle. 1998
Clark, Irene L. The Genre of Argument. Ed. Irene L. Clark. Boston: Thomson-Heinle. 1998